Best Gizmodo

Experts say the cambades accused of killing a young man not to return the console was "not drunk or drugged&quot,The_PP_asked_the_regionals;.

The experts who testified today on the third day of trial that sits on the bench while Juan Ramon G. as a defendant to strike the blow that killed a young man not to return the console that he had given assurances that the accused was not "either drunk or stoned" when the events occurred.

The jury will meet tomorrow to deliberate after the hearing to finalize today for the crime of the Playstation to a verdict.

The defense attorney tried to introduce a reasonable doubt the jury to avoid a finding of guilt against Juan Ramon G. Young, as he defended his innocence, after which I will clarify that, if he was guilty, had to take into account that he was drunk and drugged.

But today, after the forensic Juan Ramon said that he was "not drunk or drugged," the lawyer turned into a hypothesis already suggested yesterday, that was the mother of the victim, Marcos Muniz Calvin,Thunder advantage concluded the jive, who stabbed when he tried to protect the accused.

This woman is the only person of all those present in the melee that claimed to have seen clearly as Juan Ramon G. stabbed her son.

Defense attorney believe that the woman lied to ensure that the accused was stabbing her son, but argued that it can not admit it because "if convicted on, discard the possibility that it was her."

So what questions based argument that it was responding. "A Mark was killed with a kitchen knife? Where are the kitchen knives? In the kitchen. And? Where was the mother when she came out in defense of his son? In the kitchen," he explained. "HORRIBLE"

The prosecutor Benito Montero this argument seemed to him "horrible", the same adjective I use when referring to the event that is being judged.

"It's horrible that a young man of 22 years post and killed a friend because he does not return something as insignificant as a Playstation, which is nothing more than a toy," the prosecutor said.

In addition, the prosecution tried to disarm the argumentation of the prosecutor, saying: "If it was the accused who killed his friend, why so quick to remove clothing and wash?" and recalled that he said he was at the driving school to get an alibi.

See more news Pontevedra here.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 26th, 2010 at 2:05 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.